Glen Rogers, a convicted serial killer known as “The Cross Country Killer,” remains one of the most disturbing figures in American criminal history. With confirmed convictions for two murders and suspected involvement in several others, Rogers’ name continues to surface in discussions about high-profile crimes. One of the most controversial aspects of his post-conviction narrative is his claim of involvement in a nationally recognized double murder case—an allegation that sparked widespread media speculation but has never been substantiated.
This article examines the origins of Glen Rogers’ claim, why it gained attention, what official records say, and why it’s important to differentiate fact from fabrication in cases involving notorious criminals.
Who Is Glen Rogers?
Born in Hamilton, Ohio, in 1962, Glen Rogers became infamous for a violent killing spree that spanned multiple U.S. states during the early 1990s. He was eventually convicted of murdering Sandra Gallagher in California and Tina Marie Cribbs in Florida—both in 1995. These convictions led to death sentences in two states, and as of 2025, Rogers remains on death row in Florida.
Rogers was known for his charm, manipulative behavior, and erratic personality. His ability to befriend victims before turning violent made him particularly dangerous. Authorities believe he may have committed additional murders beyond those for which he was formally charged.
The High-Profile Claim: What Did Glen Rogers Say?
After his conviction, Glen Rogers made headlines by claiming that he had been involved in a nationally televised double homicide case that had already gone through extensive legal proceedings and public scrutiny. According to his own accounts, Rogers alleged that he was hired to carry out the murders and that he had direct knowledge of how and why the crime occurred.
The case he referenced had already concluded with the arrest, trial, and acquittal of a well-known public figure. Rogers’ claim resurfaced years later when it was featured in certain media productions, including interviews and documentary-style reports.
However, despite its media presence, the claim has never been validated by any official investigation, and no legal authority has charged or linked Rogers to the case through verified evidence.
Why Did Glen Rogers Make the Claim?
Criminal psychologists and legal experts have suggested several motives behind Glen Rogers’ claim:
1. Desire for Attention
As with many high-profile inmates, Rogers may have sought to maintain public relevance by inserting himself into an ongoing narrative. Making bold claims ensured continued media coverage and personal notoriety, which fits behavioral patterns observed in narcissistic and manipulative individuals.
2. Psychological Manipulation
Experts have noted Rogers’ tendency to make exaggerated or conflicting statements during interviews. His behavior has been characterized as attention-seeking, with a disregard for truth or consequence. Claiming involvement in a famous case may have been another example of psychological manipulation, aimed at confusing investigators or altering public perception.
3. Legal Strategy
Though speculative, some believe Rogers may have used the claim as a legal tactic—possibly hoping it would complicate existing charges, attract a different form of representation, or create grounds for additional appeals. Inmates on death row sometimes pursue strategies designed to delay proceedings or change public sentiment.
Investigative Findings and Official Position
Despite Glen Rogers’ claim, no official law enforcement agency has confirmed his involvement in the famous double murder case. The investigation into that case had already been closed after extensive forensic work, courtroom deliberation, and a high-profile trial. No evidence has ever surfaced to support Rogers’ story—not in the form of DNA, witness testimony, digital records, or physical connection.
Further, prosecutors and investigators familiar with both Rogers’ case and the double murder case have publicly stated that his allegations do not align with the established timeline, evidence, or factual details of the crime.
The claim is widely regarded as baseless by legal experts and has not resulted in the reopening of any case files.
The Role of Media in Spreading the Claim
After Rogers made his statement, several media outlets picked up the story, sometimes presenting it with minimal fact-checking. This gave the illusion of legitimacy to the claim and led to confusion among the public. Television programs, documentaries, and speculative articles have often highlighted Rogers’ words without emphasizing the lack of supporting evidence.
While investigative journalism has an important role in uncovering truth, the amplification of unproven claims—especially those involving high-profile crimes—can distort public understanding and cause emotional distress to those connected with the original case.
The Dangers of False Confessions
False confessions, especially from individuals already serving life or death sentences, are not uncommon. Inmates may admit to crimes they didn’t commit for various reasons:
- Seeking notoriety or relevance
- Gaining special media attention
- Creating confusion in unrelated investigations
- Developing new legal avenues through false leads
These confessions, when not grounded in verifiable evidence, can divert valuable investigative resources and prolong public speculation. In Glen Rogers’ case, the lack of corroborating data strongly suggests that his confession was fabricated for personal gain.
Expert Psychological Analysis
Mental health professionals who have reviewed Rogers’ behavior describe him as exhibiting traits of narcissistic personality disorder and antisocial behavior. This includes a disregard for truth, exploitation of others for personal gain, and a desire for control or attention.
His history of manipulative conduct, combined with his erratic courtroom demeanor and interviews, support the conclusion that his claim was made without regard for factual accuracy. Rogers has repeatedly shown an interest in keeping his name in the spotlight, regardless of the harm caused by his statements.
Legal Consequences and Law Enforcement Response
Despite the media stir, Rogers’ confession has not altered any legal proceedings related to the double murder case he claimed involvement in. Prosecutors, investigators, and defense attorneys have consistently maintained that the case was adjudicated with all relevant evidence examined in full.
No new charges or appeals have been filed in connection to Rogers’ statement, and law enforcement officials have closed the door on any suggestion that he was involved. The justice system has not entertained further review due to the complete lack of substantiating evidence.
Conclusion
Glen Rogers’ claim of involvement in a famous double murder case remains one of many unverified statements made by high-profile criminals seeking continued attention. While such confessions may appear sensational, responsible analysis must rely on evidence, official investigations, and verified facts.
As of 2025, no credible link exists between Glen Rogers and the case he referenced. His claim has been publicly rejected by legal authorities and remains unsupported by any forensic or investigative data.
False confessions—especially from those already convicted—pose ethical challenges for media, legal systems, and the public. Understanding their context is critical to maintaining trust in criminal justice and protecting the integrity of confirmed verdicts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Glen Rogers commit the double murder he claimed involvement in?
No. Law enforcement has found no credible evidence linking him to the case.
Why did Glen Rogers make the claim?
Experts suggest he sought media attention, manipulated public interest, or pursued a legal distraction strategy.
Was the double murder case reopened because of his statement?
No. The case remains closed, and Rogers’ confession has been dismissed as baseless.
Has Rogers been formally charged in connection with that case?
No. He has never been charged, and no official investigation has supported his claim.
Is Glen Rogers still on death row?
Yes. As of 2025, he remains incarcerated on Florida’s death row for two separate murder convictions.